Skip to main content

Regulatory compliance

Three frameworks from every scan.CIS hardening for the rest.

Every CIS control CISGuard evaluates carries its NIST 800-53, ISO 27001 and SOC 2 references, so one scan produces three framework coverage reports. The same hardening is the technical baseline that HIPAA, PCI-DSS, DORA, NIS2 and regional regulators expect.

Frameworks mapped
NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5, ISO/IEC 27001:2022, SOC 2
Evidence base
22 CIS Benchmarks, 3,933 controls, 3,283 automated
Coverage report formats
JSON, CSV and SARIF, alongside PDF and HTML reports
Status per control
Satisfied, partially satisfied or not met, with scan timestamps
Evidence cadence
Continuous: every scheduled scan updates every report
Deployment
On-premises, private cloud or air-gapped

Supported by the same hardening

Regulations the same controls support.

These regulations do not get a separate mapping. They get the CIS Benchmark evidence they ask for, with per-control history, drift detection and the exception register, from the same scans.

Frequently asked

Compliance mapping questions, answered directly.

How does CISGuard map a single CIS benchmark scan to multiple regulatory frameworks?

Each CIS control in CISGuard is tagged with its NIST 800-53 control IDs, ISO 27001:2022 Annex A clauses and SOC 2 Trust Services Criteria. A single scan generates three framework coverage reports showing satisfied, partially satisfied and not-met status per control. Regulations such as HIPAA, HITRUST, PCI-DSS, NYDFS and CMMC are supported through the same CIS hardening evidence, history and exception register rather than a separate mapping.

How does CIS benchmark compliance help with DORA?

DORA (Digital Operational Resilience Act) requires EU financial entities to implement ICT risk management controls under Articles 5 to 16. CIS benchmarks provide system hardening for Article 9, continuous monitoring for detection under Article 10, drift detection for change management under Article 11, and audit-ready evidence for third-party ICT risk reviews under Article 15.

Can CISGuard help achieve FedRAMP authorization?

Yes. CISGuard maps 50 NIST 800-53 Rev. 5 controls across 13 control families, directly supporting FedRAMP Moderate and High baselines. Air-gapped deployment is available for FedRAMP High and IL4 and IL5 environments. Continuous monitoring supports FedRAMP ConMon requirements (CA-7), and automated evidence replaces manual POA&M documentation.

What is the difference between CMMC and NIST 800-53?

CMMC (Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification) is required for US defense contractors and aligns with NIST SP 800-171, which derives from NIST 800-53. CISGuard automates the NIST 800-53 technical controls that underpin both frameworks, covering the configuration-based practice requirements of CMMC Level 2 through CIS benchmark scanning.

What evidence does CISGuard generate to satisfy ISO 27001 Annex A audit requirements?

CISGuard maps 36 CIS controls directly to ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A, primarily the A.5 (organizational), A.7 (physical) and A.8 (technological) themes. Auditors receive a framework coverage report listing each Annex A control, its satisfaction status, the underlying CIS controls and scan timestamps. Continuous scanning satisfies Clause 9.1 (monitoring, measurement, analysis and evaluation).

Facing a compliance deadline?

Our compliance engineers have helped organizations achieve regulatory readiness through a seamless, fully managed deployment.