A Defender for Cloud alternative, for compliance beyond the cloud.
Microsoft Defender for Cloud is a strong cloud-native CSPM with regulatory compliance dashboards, including CIS standards for Azure, AWS, and GCP. CISGuard picks up where cloud-scoped tooling stops: on-premises Windows and Linux servers, air-gapped networks, and multi-framework evidence with no cloud dependency.
Common reasons to look beyond Microsoft Defender for Cloud.
- Defender for Cloud is cloud-native by design; on-premises and air-gapped estates fall outside its natural scope
- Coverage and experience are strongest in Azure; audit scope often spans estates that are not Azure-centric
- Compliance dashboards focus on cloud resource posture rather than deep OS-level benchmark assessment across the server estate
- Organizations with sovereignty or disconnection requirements cannot depend on a cloud service for compliance evidence
Where Microsoft Defender for Cloud is genuinely strong
- Native, deeply integrated posture management for Azure, with multicloud connectors for AWS and GCP
- Regulatory compliance dashboards including CIS standards for major cloud platforms
- Part of the Microsoft security ecosystem with unified licensing for Microsoft-centric organizations
- Continuous cloud-resource assessment with recommendations integrated into Azure workflows
Where CISGuard is materially different
- Deep OS-level CIS benchmark coverage for Windows and Linux servers, on-premises and in any cloud
- Fully on-premises and air-gapped operation, no cloud service dependency for scanning or evidence
- 22 CIS Benchmarks and 3,928 controls assessed continuously across the whole estate
- Multi-framework evidence built in: NIST 800-53, ISO 27001, and SOC 2 from one scan
- Per-deployment licensing independent of cloud consumption or subscription tiers
- Managed onboarding covering hybrid estates: data centers, branch infrastructure, and cloud workloads
CISGuard is the right choice when:
- Hybrid organizations whose audit scope includes on-premises servers alongside cloud workloads
- Air-gapped, classified, and disconnected environments where cloud-delivered tooling is not viable
- Compliance teams needing OS-hardening depth (Windows and Linux benchmarks) beyond cloud resource posture
- Organizations that are not Azure-centric but still need CIS-based compliance evidence
Migration questions, answered directly.
Is CISGuard a replacement for Microsoft Defender for Cloud?
They solve different scopes. Defender for Cloud is cloud-native posture management, strongest for Azure with multicloud connectors. CISGuard is CIS benchmark compliance across on-premises, hybrid, and air-gapped estates with deep Windows and Linux OS coverage. Azure-centric organizations often keep Defender for Cloud for cloud posture and add CISGuard for the server estate and audit evidence layer.
Defender for Cloud already shows CIS compliance. Why add CISGuard?
Defender for Cloud's regulatory dashboards assess cloud resource configurations against standards including CIS for Azure, AWS, and GCP. CISGuard assesses the operating systems themselves: 22 CIS Benchmarks covering 3,928 OS-level and platform controls, including servers that never touch a cloud connector. If your audit scope includes on-premises Windows and Linux hardening, that depth is the gap CISGuard fills.
Does CISGuard require any Microsoft or cloud dependency?
No. CISGuard runs fully on-premises, including in air-gapped networks, with no cloud service, tenant, or agent callback required. Scanning, drift detection, dashboards, and evidence generation all operate inside your environment. This makes CISGuard viable where cloud-delivered compliance tooling is regulatorily or operationally impossible, such as classified and disconnected networks.
Can CISGuard produce evidence for frameworks beyond CIS?
Yes. Every control CISGuard assesses is mapped to NIST 800-53, ISO 27001, and SOC 2, so one continuous scanning program produces evidence for multiple frameworks simultaneously. This complements cloud-native dashboards well: cloud posture from your CSPM, and estate-wide, auditor-oriented framework evidence from CISGuard.
How does CISGuard licensing differ from Defender for Cloud?
CISGuard uses per-deployment licensing: one predictable price per deployment covering all benchmarks and framework mappings, independent of cloud consumption. We do not characterize Microsoft's pricing; Defender for Cloud is licensed through Microsoft's own plans. Teams comparing the two should model their hybrid asset mix, since the products meter fundamentally different things.
Evaluating CISGuard against Microsoft Defender for Cloud?
Our compliance engineers will walk through a side-by-side evaluation specific to your environment and audit scope.